
With a growing obese population, obesity has become problem worldwide, and Korea is no exception. Obesity refers to a state of excessive accumulation of fat tissues in the body, and it is accompanied by metabolic disorders and is known to be multifactorial, including genetic, social environmental, and economic factors1
). Factors that cause obesity include diet, lack of exercise, genetic factors, and environmental factors. In particular, social and economic growth led to changes in lifestyle and diet with increased intake of carbohydrates and high-calorie foods, which has become a major cause of obesity.
Among carbohydrates, sugars are associated with dental caries, a serious oral disease, and considering that there are various antecedents to dental caries in addition to cariogenic bacteria, such as food consumption, diet, and lifestyle factors, obesity and dental caries have a lot in common. While the relationship between obesity and dental caries has been studied extensively, there is yet a consensus on the significant association and correlation between obesity and dental caries. This is presumably due to the fact that obesity is also related to high-fat diet, and the relationship between fat and dental caries should also be investigated.
Many Korean studies have been conducted on the relationship between obesity and dental caries, but the results are inconsistent. Some studies reported that the two are not significantly associated2,3
), and some studies reported that obese individuals have a higher dental caries rate4,5
). There are also studies reporting that dental caries decreases with increasing obesity6,7
). Therefore, more research data needs to be accumulated to address this inconsistency in study findings pertaining to obesity and dental caries. In this background, we planned a study to investigate the relationship between obesity and dental caries, and here, we report the results of a pilot study conducted on students of a single university to analyze obesity-related test and oral assessment results.
Obese students who were registered at the Obesity Clinic at Konyang University and normal-weight students who served as exercise and lifestyle modification assistants at the same clinic who provided an informed consent were enrolled in this study. The sample consisted of 21 male and 40 female students. With reference to the Asia-Pacific obesity criteria using body mass index (BMI), there were 42 obese students (BMI≥25) and 19 normal-weight students (18.5≤BMI<25).
Oral examination and recording were performed by one dentist and one dental hygiene student as an assistant, and dental caries was determined based on the World Health Organizaiton criteria. Because dental caries is influenced by oral environment management, a stain was applied before examining the dental plaque, and the Sum of Turesky modification of the Quigley–Hein index was used as a plaque index. To assess the reliability of the dental caries examination, a second examination was performed four weeks later, and the equivalent form reliability was 0.889 for decayed teeth, 0.921 for missing teeth, 0.967 for filled teeth, 0.757 for decayed surfaces, 0.957 for missing surfaces, and 0.967 for filled surfaces.
Participants’ anthropometric data were analyzed using InBody (InBody Co., Seoul, Korea), a body composition analyzer with direct segmental multi-frequency-bioelectric impedance analysis. Blood samples were collected and sent to the Konyang University Hospital laboratory for low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride measurements.
The p-value of the one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was 0.343 for decayed-missing-filled teeth (DMFT), 0.124 for decayed-missing-filled surfaces (DMFS), 0.433 for LDL, 0.189 for HDL, 0.703 for triglyceride, and 0.882 for BMI, based on which parametric testing was deemed appropriate. Thus, the differences between the normal-weight and obesity groups were analyzed using independent t-tests. As oral environmental management had to be controlled for in order to examine the relationship between obesity and dental caries, one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze dental caries according to obesity after controlling for the dental plaque index. The relationship between obesity and dental caries was analyzed using partial correlation analysis after controlling for the dental plaque index. For sex-specific analyses, the Mann–Whitney U-test, a non-parametric test, was used due to the smaller samples. Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software.
Regarding the differences in dental caries indices between the normal and obese groups, the obese group showed lower indices overall, but none of the differences were significant with the exception of DMFS (Table 1). DMFS was 16.11±14.53 in the normal group and 8.69± 7.47 in the obese group, showing a significant difference (p=0.047). The differences in the dental caries indices were analyzed after controlling for the dental plaque index, and the obese group showed significantly lower missing teeth, missing surface, filled surface, and DMFS compared to the normal group.
Difference of Dental Caries Status according to Obesity
Variable | Normal group (n=19) | Obese group (n=42) | p-value |
p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decayed teeth | 0.84±1.07 | 0.43±0.91 | 0.126 | 0.068 |
Missing teeth | 0.26±0.56 | 0.02±0.15 | 0.083 | 0.014 |
Filled teeth | 5.89±4.38 | 4.64±3.81 | 0.261 | 0.393 |
DMFT | 7.00±4.28 | 5.10±4.01 | 0.098 | 0.147 |
Decayed surfaces | 0.84±1.07 | 0.79±1.80 | 0.900 | 0.534 |
Missing surfaces | 1.11±2.66 | 0.12±0.77 | 0.129 | 0.035 |
Filled surfaces | 14.16±13.38 | 7.79±7.04 | 0.063 | 0.038 |
DMFS | 16.11±14.53 | 8.69±7.47 | 0.047 | 0.020 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
DMFT: decayed-missing-filled teeth, DMFS: decayed-missing- filled surfaces.
aIndependent t-test.
bUnivariate analysis adjusting dental plaque index.
In males, the differences in dental caries indices between the normal and obese groups were analyzed using a nonparametric test, and the results showed that there were no significant differences in any of the dental caries indices between the two groups (Table 2).
Difference of Dental Caries Status according to Obesity in Male
Variable | Normal group (n=6) | Obese group (n=15) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Decayed teeth | 1.5 (0.0∼4.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼4.0) | 0.107 |
Missing teeth | 0.0 (0.0∼0.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼1.0) | 0.527 |
Filled teeth | 4.0 (0.0∼17.0) | 5.0 (0.0∼14.0) | 0.814 |
DMFT | 6.0 (2.0∼17.0) | 6.0 (0.0∼16.0) | 0.784 |
Decayed surfaces | 1.5 (0.0∼4.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼9.0) | 0.436 |
Missing surfaces | 0.0 (0.0∼0.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼5.0) | 0.527 |
Filled surfaces | 8.5 (0.0∼37.0) | 8.0 (0.0∼19.0) | 0.754 |
DMFS | 10.5 (2.0∼37.0) | 9.0 (0.0∼21.0) | 0.755 |
Values are presented as median (minimum∼maximum).
DMFT: decayed-missing-filled teeth, DMFS: decayed-missing- filled surfaces.
aMann–Whitney U-test.
In females, the differences in dental caries indices between the normal and obese groups were analyzed using a nonparametric test, and the results showed that there were significant differences in missing teeth, missing surface, and DMFS between the two groups, where the median DMFS was higher in the normal group (15.0) than in the obese group (7.0) (Table 3).
Difference of Dental Caries Status according to Obesity in Female
Variable | Normal group (n=13) | Obese group (n=27) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Decayed teeth | 0.0 (0.0∼2.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼3.0) | 0.167 |
Missing teeth | 0.0 (0.0∼2.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼0.0) | 0.003 |
Filled teeth | 7.0 (0.0∼11.0) | 5.0 (0.0∼12.0) | 0.113 |
DMFT | 8.0 (0.0∼12.0) | 6.0 (0.0∼12.0) | 0.071 |
Decayed surfaces | 0.0 (0.0∼2.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼5.0) | 0.167 |
Missing surfaces | 0.0 (0.0∼10.0) | 0.0 (0.0∼0.0) | 0.003 |
Filled surfaces | 14.0 (0.0∼47.0) | 7.0 (0.0∼31.0) | 0.072 |
DMFS | 15.0 (0.0∼57.0) | 7.0 (0.0∼32.0) | 0.046 |
Values are presented as median (minimum∼maximum).
DMFT: decayed-missing-filled teeth, DMFS: decayed-missing- filled surfaces.
aMann–Whitney U-test.
The relationship between obesity and dental caries was analyzed with partial correlation analysis after controlling for the dental plaque index (Table 4). There was no relationship between DMFT and DMFS with BMI, body fat mass, percentage body fat, waist hip ratio, amount of protein, mineral, body fat, and body water measured using a body composition analyzer. Regarding the blood samples, there was a weak negative correlation between LDL and DMFT (Table 5).
Partial Correlation between Obesity Related Index and Dental Caries Index Adjusting Dental Plaque Index
Variable | DMFT | BMI | BFM | PBF | WHR | Protein | Mineral | Body fat | Body water |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMFT | 1 | 0.016 | 0.019 | 0.060 | 0.094 | −0.007 | −0.005 | 0.022 | 0.026 |
DMFS | 0.799 |
−0.023 | 0.124 | 0.157 | 0.033 | −0.070 | −0.067 | 0.061 | −0.043 |
DMFT: decayed-missing-filled teeth, DMFS: decayed-missing-filled surfaces, BMI: body mass index, BFM: body fat mass, PBF: percentage body fat, WHR: waist hip ratio.
*p<0.05.
Partial Correlation between Cholesterol and Dental Caries Index Adjusting Dental Plaque Index
Variable | DMFT | LDL | HDL | Triglyceride |
---|---|---|---|---|
DMFT | 1 | −0.256 |
−0.080 | −0.098 |
DMFS | 0.820 |
−0.199 | −0.006 | −0.157 |
DMFT: decayed-missing-filled teeth, DMFS: decayed-missing-filled surfaces, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein.
*p<0.05.
In this study, some dental caries-related indices were significantly lower in the obese group than in the normal-weight group, with no significant differences in other indices, suggesting that obesity is either not related to dental caries or actually negatively correlated with dental caries. A review of 29 studies on obesity and dental caries in children and adolescents published between 1990 and 2020 found that the results on the relationship between obesity and dental caries are inconsistent. Thirteen out of these 29 studies (44.8%) reported an insignificant relationship between obesity and dental caries, while 16 (55.2%) reported a significant relationship between the two8
). However, even among studies that reported significance, the prevalence of dental caries was higher in overweight and obese individuals in some studies5,9-13
), lower in obese individuals in some studies14-16
), and higher in the underweight group in some studies10,17
).
To examine the relationship between obesity and dental caries, the inconsistent findings of epidemiological studies should be evaluated, and this requires a close examination of the diet that induces dental caries and that underlying obesity. In addition to excessive food intake, a high-fat diet can induce obesity18,19
). While obese individuals show a higher total carbohydrate consumption than their normal- weight counterparts, their exposure to carbohydrates decreases if lifestyle factors are controlled for20
). Lee et al.21
) reported that total sugar consumption is not significantly correlated with body weight, BMI, and percent body fat. Based on these results, we can speculate that obesity is more influenced by fat intake, as opposed to carbohydrate intake. Fats in diet are reported to help eliminate sugar, and some fatty acids have antibacterial effects22
). These results suggest that individuals with high fat-induced obesity would have a lower prevalence of dental caries.
In contrast, Kim et al.23
) reported in their study on obese adults that the male obese group had a higher protein and carbohydrate consumption, while the female obese group had a higher intake of simple sugars compared to their normal-weight counterparts. Bang and Hyeon24
) also reported that while there were no differences in men, obese women had a higher carbohydrate consumption than their normal-weight counterparts. Dental caries, which is closely related to carbohydrates, can be predicted by obesity induced by a high-carbohydrate diet. Although we did measure blood cholesterol concentrations in this study, we could not determine whether the diet pattern that induced obesity was a high-fat diet or high-carbohydrate diet. Hence, subsequent studies should specifically investigate the diets of the obese and normal-weight groups.
However, a review of studies that investigated the association between obesity and dental caries reported that the relationship cannot be described solely based on a single common risk factor or diet, and although all risk factors must be evaluated, it is not easy to evaluate them simultaneously, which results in contradictory and inconsistent results25
). Modeer et al.26
) included flow rate of whole saliva, chronic disease, drug therapy, and socioeconomic factors as confounders in identifying the relationship between obesity and dental caries. Thus, various factors that can potentially influence the relationship must be reviewed for an accurate analysis of the association between obesity and dental caries.
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Konyang University Hospital (No. KYUH 13-89).
Author contributions
Conceptualization: SooJeong Hwang and MinSeock Seo. Data acquisition: SooJeong Hwang. Statistical Analysis: SooJeong Hwang, Hoon Kim, and MinSeock Seo. Supervision: SooJeong Hwang. Writing–original draft: SooJeong Hwang, Hoon Kim, and MinSeock Seo. Writing–review & editing: SooJeong Hwang, Hoon Kim, and MinSeock Seo.
![]() |
![]() |